LLVMWrapper: attractive nuisance macros #83442
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Mark-Simulacrum (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. Due to the way GitHub handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
r? @cuviper |
|
Just for clarity, can you fix the commit message to say |
|
Whoops, fixed that typo (in the PR description: I assume you don't want a force-push to fix the underlying git commit). |
I do want that so we have a clear history. I understand that force-pushing sometimes obscures reviews, but I think we're fine in this case. |
THis came up in the review of rust-lang#83425: it's hard to imagine a use of LLVM_VERSION_LE() or LLVM_VERSION_EQ() that's not asking for trouble when a point release gets created, so let's just discard them to prevent the issue.
|
force-pushed the commit message typo fix |
durin42
force-pushed
the
remove-questionable-macros
branch
from
ac5034a
to
04961d2
Compare
|
Thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit 04961d2 has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Rollup of 8 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#83041 (stabilize debug_non_exhaustive) - rust-lang#83349 (Remove Option::{unwrap_none, expect_none}.) - rust-lang#83420 (Add documentation for rustdoc-gui tests) - rust-lang#83421 (Add Result::into_err where the Ok variant is the never type) - rust-lang#83427 (small cleanups in rustc_errors / emitter) - rust-lang#83434 (Update RELEASES.md) - rust-lang#83440 (Use intra-doc link in core::cell) - rust-lang#83442 (LLVMWrapper: attractive nuisance macros) Failed merges: - rust-lang#83438 (Update RELEASES.md) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This came up in the review of #83425: it's hard to imagine a use of
LLVM_VERSION_LE() or LLVM_VERSION_EQ() that's not asking for trouble
when a point release gets created, so let's just discard them to prevent
the issue.