Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[beta] backport rollup #99098

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 10, 2022
Merged

[beta] backport rollup #99098

merged 12 commits into from
Jul 10, 2022

Conversation

Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum commented Jul 9, 2022 •
edited
Loading

There's a few more as-yet-unapproved/unmerged PRs that'll land later, but creating a partial rollup for now so that we can include at least some PRs in the first crater run.

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

cjgillot and others added 10 commits July 9, 2022 17:08
@cjgillot @Mark-Simulacrum
Return a FxIndexSet in is_late_bound query.
d043f62 
This return value is iterated upon by borrowck, hence the need to preserve
a deterministic iteration order.
@cjgillot @Mark-Simulacrum
Add regression test.
36598fc
@michaelwoerister @Mark-Simulacrum
Add link to issue for src/test/incremental/async-lifetimes.rs
8a23603
@notriddle @Mark-Simulacrum
rustdoc: filter '_ lifetimes from ty::PolyTraitRef
d8395c0 
Fixes rust-lang#98697
@oli-obk @Mark-Simulacrum
pessimistically treat all function items as containing an opaque type
32dd17b
@oli-obk @Mark-Simulacrum
use a method instead of manually doing what its body does
b721490
@oli-obk @Mark-Simulacrum
Make evaluate_obligation not succeed unconditionally if it register…
1b1022d 
…ed new hidden types for opaque types
@oli-obk @Mark-Simulacrum
Remove type flag based opaque type workaround
e1c6655
@oli-obk @Mark-Simulacrum
not knowing about opaque types is worse than not knowing about region…
68a4696 
…s, make sure we don't accidentally mark something as ok-modulo-regions if there are opaque types involved
@oli-obk @Mark-Simulacrum
Only register hidden types for opaque types from the current crate, n…
c121fe3 
…othing else would work anyway.
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Collaborator

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • Pull requests are usually filed against the master branch for this repo, but this one is against beta. Please double check that you specified the right target!

@rustbot rustbot added T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 9, 2022
@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Jul 9, 2022
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Mark-Simulacrum
Fix tests after beta backport
5a81254
@Mark-Simulacrum
Backport "Update llvm-project rust-lang#98567"
b5c6911 
This cherry picks:

* c9676870a8f378940ec446c4184254f361feabe6
* f14a034634ac7ddc314008e39d62af6ceae0166a
* 3317cfea1b72c0861c9e4e9f5eba5713fd19e7f7
* 8b6b5014fdad3a750f7242a6bfdcad83619498d4
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum mentioned this pull request Jul 9, 2022
Merged
@Mark-Simulacrum
Copy link
Member Author

@bors r+ rollup=never p=10

Will kick off the first crater after this, so bumping priority.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 9, 2022

📌 Commit b5c6911 has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 9, 2022
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 10, 2022

⌛ Testing commit b5c6911 with merge 93ef0cd...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Jul 10, 2022

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Pushing 93ef0cd to beta...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Jul 10, 2022
@bors bors merged commit 93ef0cd into rust-lang:beta Jul 10, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.63.0 milestone Jul 10, 2022
@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum deleted the beta-next branch July 10, 2022 14:44
@cuviper cuviper mentioned this pull request Jul 13, 2022
Closed
@pnkfelix pnkfelix mentioned this pull request Jul 28, 2022
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@Mark-Simulacrum Mark-Simulacrum

Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-rustdoc Relevant to the rustdoc team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.63.0
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
9 participants
@Mark-Simulacrum @rust-highfive @rust-log-analyzer @bors @rustbot @cjgillot @michaelwoerister @notriddle @oli-obk