Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate .status.succeeded and .status.reason #674

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 19, 2021

Conversation

imjasonh
Copy link
Contributor

A step toward #517 -- if people are okay with this we can remove it in the next release (v0.5.0)

Changes

Marks .status.succeeded and .status.reason as Deprecated, updates some doc comments I noticed while I was in the area.

/kind cleanup

Submitter Checklist

  • [n/a] Includes tests if functionality changed/was added
  • [n/a] Includes docs if changes are user-facing
  • [y] Set a kind label on this PR
  • [y] Release notes block has been filled in, or marked NONE

See the contributor guide
for details on coding conventions, github and prow interactions, and the code review process.

Release Notes

BuildRun .status.succeeded and .status.reason are marked as deprecated in favor of .status.conditions.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. release-note Label for when a PR has specified a release note labels Mar 17, 2021
@gabemontero gabemontero added the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API label Mar 17, 2021
@gabemontero
Copy link
Member

We have an api-change label ... I would classify deprecation of fields in the api change category, even if the fields are not actually removed yet.

I added the label, but did not remove the cleanup label (though maybe we could). Conversely if there is consensus disagreement on my take, I don't feel strongly enough to argue much.

Thoughts?

@gabemontero
Copy link
Member

/approve

I'll defer on lgtm to let a non-RH'er chime in for "multi-org" agreement.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 17, 2021
Copy link
Member

@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 19, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 33cf526 into shipwright-io:master Mar 19, 2021
@adambkaplan adambkaplan mentioned this pull request Mar 22, 2021
4 tasks
@qu1queee qu1queee added this to the release-v0.4.0 milestone Mar 24, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Label for when a PR has specified a release note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants