Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix suggestion: remove faulty symlink that causes installation fail #50

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

d4gg4d
Copy link
Contributor

@d4gg4d d4gg4d commented Feb 1, 2024

ansible-core 2.15.9 introduces tar filepath normalization and current symlink is inconsistent to that.

See more details https:/ansible/ansible/blob/080b5103bef75c4a1d19d576ea8ebf49e149b48b/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.15.rst#L34C195-L34C242

I'm not sure if this symlink is still relevant and if so, what should be the replacement for it. Please advice or merge and release fixed version.

ansible-core 2.15.9 introduces tarfilepath normalization and current
symlink is inconsistent to that.

See more details https:/ansible/ansible/blob/080b5103bef75c4a1d19d576ea8ebf49e149b48b/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.15.rst#L34C195-L34C242
@sleighzy sleighzy merged commit 23dc5f7 into sleighzy:master Feb 12, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@sleighzy
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for the PR @d4gg4d I’ve merged this to master and re-published to Ansible Galaxy so let me know how you get on. The tests were previously using the symlink so no longer work right now, but this was a critical fix given the role couldn’t even be installed, I’ll revisit the tests problem as soon as I’m able. Thanks once again, much appreciated.

@d4gg4d
Copy link
Contributor Author

d4gg4d commented Feb 15, 2024

newer 1.3.1 taken into use and works as expected 👍

@d4gg4d d4gg4d deleted the feature/remove-faulty-symlink branch February 15, 2024 07:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants