-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 767
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[sd-reverse-delegation] new strategy: sd reverse delegation #1341
Open
pierremarsotlyon1
wants to merge
2
commits into
snapshot-labs:master
Choose a base branch
from
pierremarsotlyon1:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | ||
# reverse delegation | ||
|
||
The reserve delegation allow the delegation address to receive automatically all the voting power, even if an user didn't delegate to the delegation address. | ||
Each user can still delegate to the delegation address, it will change nothing. | ||
If an user delegate to another address then the delegation address, the delegation address will not receive his voting power. | ||
|
||
Here is an example of parameters: | ||
|
||
```json | ||
[ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "Stake DAO reverse delegation", | ||
"strategy": { | ||
"name": "sd-reverse-delegation", | ||
"params": { | ||
"strategies": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "sd-vote-boost-twavp", | ||
"params": { | ||
"veToken": "0x0C462Dbb9EC8cD1630f1728B2CFD2769d09f0dd5", | ||
"liquidLocker": "0xD13F8C25CceD32cdfA79EB5eD654Ce3e484dCAF5", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0xE55843a90672f7d8218285e51EE8fF8E233F35d5", | ||
"symbol": "sdToken", | ||
"decimals": 18, | ||
"sampleSize": 30, | ||
"sampleStep": 5, | ||
"avgBlockTime": 12.0 | ||
} | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"delegationSpace": "sdangle.eth", | ||
"delegationAddress": "0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0xE55843a90672f7d8218285e51EE8fF8E233F35d5" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"network": "1", | ||
"addresses": [ | ||
"0x12d3D411d010891a88BFf2401bD73FA41fb1316e", | ||
"0xDdB50FfDbA4D89354E1088e4EA402de895562173", | ||
"0x1A162A5FdaEbb0113f7B83Ed87A43BCF0B6a4D1E", | ||
"0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"0xF930EBBd05eF8b25B1797b9b2109DDC9B0d43063", | ||
"0xb0e83C2D71A991017e0116d58c5765Abc57384af" | ||
], | ||
"snapshot": 18430677 | ||
} | ||
] | ||
|
||
``` |
38 changes: 38 additions & 0 deletions
38
src/strategies/sd-reverse-delegation/examples-sdangle.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ | ||
[ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "Stake DAO reverse delegation", | ||
"strategy": { | ||
"name": "sd-reverse-delegation", | ||
"params": { | ||
"strategies": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "sd-vote-boost-twavp", | ||
"params": { | ||
"veToken": "0x0C462Dbb9EC8cD1630f1728B2CFD2769d09f0dd5", | ||
"liquidLocker": "0xD13F8C25CceD32cdfA79EB5eD654Ce3e484dCAF5", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0xE55843a90672f7d8218285e51EE8fF8E233F35d5", | ||
"symbol": "sdToken", | ||
"decimals": 18, | ||
"sampleSize": 30, | ||
"sampleStep": 5, | ||
"avgBlockTime": 12.0 | ||
} | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"delegationSpace": "sdangle.eth", | ||
"delegationAddress": "0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0xE55843a90672f7d8218285e51EE8fF8E233F35d5" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"network": "1", | ||
"addresses": [ | ||
"0x12d3D411d010891a88BFf2401bD73FA41fb1316e", | ||
"0xDdB50FfDbA4D89354E1088e4EA402de895562173", | ||
"0x1A162A5FdaEbb0113f7B83Ed87A43BCF0B6a4D1E", | ||
"0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"0xF930EBBd05eF8b25B1797b9b2109DDC9B0d43063", | ||
"0xb0e83C2D71A991017e0116d58c5765Abc57384af" | ||
], | ||
"snapshot": 18430677 | ||
} | ||
] |
35 changes: 35 additions & 0 deletions
35
src/strategies/sd-reverse-delegation/examples-sdcrv-gov.json
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@ | ||
[ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "Stake DAO reverse delegation", | ||
"strategy": { | ||
"name": "sd-reverse-delegation", | ||
"params": { | ||
"strategies": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "sd-vote-boost-twavp", | ||
"params": { | ||
"symbol": "sdCRV", | ||
"veToken": "0x5f3b5DfEb7B28CDbD7FAba78963EE202a494e2A2", | ||
"decimals": 18, | ||
"sampleSize": 30, | ||
"sampleStep": 5, | ||
"avgBlockTime": 12, | ||
"liquidLocker": "0x52f541764E6e90eeBc5c21Ff570De0e2D63766B6", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0x7f50786A0b15723D741727882ee99a0BF34e3466" | ||
} | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"delegationSpace": "sdcrv-gov.eth", | ||
"delegationAddress": "0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0x7f50786A0b15723D741727882ee99a0BF34e3466" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"network": "1", | ||
"addresses": [ | ||
"0xb0e83C2D71A991017e0116d58c5765Abc57384af", | ||
"0xb957DccaA1CCFB1eB78B495B499801D591d8a403", | ||
"0x52ea58f4FC3CEd48fa18E909226c1f8A0EF887DC" | ||
], | ||
"snapshot": 18481919 | ||
} | ||
] |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ | ||
[ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "Stake DAO reverse delegation", | ||
"strategy": { | ||
"name": "sd-reverse-delegation", | ||
"params": { | ||
"strategies": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "sd-vote-boost-twavp-v3", | ||
"params": { | ||
"pools": [ | ||
"0xca0253a98d16e9c1e3614cafda19318ee69772d0" | ||
], | ||
"symbol": "sdToken", | ||
"sdToken": "0xD1b5651E55D4CeeD36251c61c50C889B36F6abB5", | ||
"veToken": "0x5f3b5DfEb7B28CDbD7FAba78963EE202a494e2A2", | ||
"decimals": 18, | ||
"botAddress": "0xb4542526afee2fda1d584213d1521272a398b42a", | ||
"sampleSize": 10, | ||
"sampleStep": 5, | ||
"liquidLocker": "0x52f541764E6e90eeBc5c21Ff570De0e2D63766B6", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0x7f50786A0b15723D741727882ee99a0BF34e3466", | ||
"whiteListedAddress": [ | ||
"0x1c0D72a330F2768dAF718DEf8A19BAb019EEAd09" | ||
] | ||
} | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"delegationSpace": "sdcrv.eth", | ||
"delegationAddress": "0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0x7f50786A0b15723D741727882ee99a0BF34e3466" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"network": "1", | ||
"addresses": [ | ||
"0xb0e83C2D71A991017e0116d58c5765Abc57384af", | ||
"0xb4542526AfeE2FdA1D584213D1521272a398B42a", | ||
"0x578a4af5cbc3009487a89be88bc560157200795b", | ||
"0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"0xF930EBBd05eF8b25B1797b9b2109DDC9B0d43063", | ||
"0xf872703F1C8f93fA186869Bac83BAC5A0c87C3c8" | ||
], | ||
"snapshot": 18430677 | ||
} | ||
] |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ | ||
[ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "Stake DAO reverse delegation", | ||
"strategy": { | ||
"name": "sd-reverse-delegation", | ||
"params": { | ||
"strategies": [ | ||
{ | ||
"name": "sd-vote-boost-twavp", | ||
"params": { | ||
"veToken": "0x0C462Dbb9EC8cD1630f1728B2CFD2769d09f0dd5", | ||
"liquidLocker": "0xD13F8C25CceD32cdfA79EB5eD654Ce3e484dCAF5", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0xE55843a90672f7d8218285e51EE8fF8E233F35d5", | ||
"symbol": "sdToken", | ||
"decimals": 18, | ||
"sampleSize": 30, | ||
"sampleStep": 5, | ||
"avgBlockTime": 12.0 | ||
} | ||
} | ||
], | ||
"delegationSpace": "sdangle.eth", | ||
"delegationAddress": "0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"sdTokenGauge": "0xE55843a90672f7d8218285e51EE8fF8E233F35d5" | ||
} | ||
}, | ||
"network": "1", | ||
"addresses": [ | ||
"0x12d3D411d010891a88BFf2401bD73FA41fb1316e", | ||
"0xDdB50FfDbA4D89354E1088e4EA402de895562173", | ||
"0x1A162A5FdaEbb0113f7B83Ed87A43BCF0B6a4D1E", | ||
"0x52ea58f4fc3ced48fa18e909226c1f8a0ef887dc", | ||
"0xF930EBBd05eF8b25B1797b9b2109DDC9B0d43063", | ||
"0xb0e83C2D71A991017e0116d58c5765Abc57384af" | ||
], | ||
"snapshot": 18530676 | ||
} | ||
] |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ | ||
import { getDelegations } from '../../utils/delegation'; | ||
import { getScoresDirect } from '../../utils'; | ||
import { multicall } from '../../utils'; | ||
import { formatUnits } from '@ethersproject/units'; | ||
import { BigNumber } from '@ethersproject/bignumber'; | ||
import { getAddress } from '@ethersproject/address'; | ||
|
||
export const author = 'pierremarsotlyon1'; | ||
export const version = '0.1.0'; | ||
export const dependOnOtherAddress = true; | ||
|
||
// Used ABI | ||
const abi = [ | ||
'function totalSupply() external view returns (uint256)' | ||
]; | ||
|
||
export async function strategy( | ||
space, | ||
network, | ||
provider, | ||
addresses, | ||
options, | ||
snapshot | ||
) { | ||
|
||
const delegationSpace = options.delegationSpace || space; | ||
|
||
// Fetch totalSupply + delegations data | ||
const calls: any[] = [ | ||
multicall(network, provider, abi, [[options.sdTokenGauge, 'totalSupply']], { blockTag: snapshot }), | ||
getDelegations( | ||
delegationSpace, | ||
network, | ||
addresses, | ||
snapshot | ||
) | ||
]; | ||
|
||
// If we have an delegation address, fetch VP for users who voted (to minus them after) | ||
let delegationAddressLc = ""; | ||
let haveDelegationAddress = false; | ||
if (options.delegationAddress) { | ||
|
||
delegationAddressLc = options.delegationAddress.toLowerCase(); | ||
haveDelegationAddress = addresses.find((addr: string) => addr.toLowerCase() === delegationAddressLc); | ||
|
||
if (haveDelegationAddress) { | ||
// Fetch vp from users who voted | ||
const otherAddresses = addresses.filter((addr: string) => addr.toLowerCase() !== delegationAddressLc); | ||
calls.push(getScoresDirect( | ||
space, | ||
options.strategies, | ||
network, | ||
provider, | ||
otherAddresses, | ||
snapshot | ||
)); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Fetch | ||
let [callTotalSupply, delegations, ...userScores] = await Promise.all(calls); | ||
|
||
// Compute the total supply | ||
const totalSupply = parseFloat(formatUnits(BigNumber.from(callTotalSupply.shift()[0]), 18)); | ||
|
||
if (Object.keys(delegations).length === 0) return {}; | ||
|
||
// Just to avoid type error | ||
const delegationValues = Object.values(delegations) as string[][]; | ||
|
||
// Fetch the VP for each delegates | ||
const scores = ( | ||
await getScoresDirect( | ||
space, | ||
options.strategies, | ||
network, | ||
provider, | ||
delegationValues.reduce((a: string[], b: string[]) => | ||
a.concat(b) | ||
), | ||
snapshot | ||
) | ||
).filter((score) => Object.keys(score).length !== 0); | ||
|
||
// Sum the VP for all delegators | ||
// ie : VP delegator = SUM(vp delegates) | ||
// Here we should have something like : | ||
// {'0x1': 100, '0x2': 300} | ||
const delegationSum = Object.fromEntries( | ||
addresses.map((address) => { | ||
const addressScore = delegations[address] | ||
? delegations[address].reduce( | ||
(a, b) => a + scores.reduce((x, y) => (y[b] ? x + y[b] : x), 0), | ||
0 | ||
) | ||
: 0; | ||
return [address.toLowerCase(), addressScore]; | ||
}) | ||
); | ||
|
||
// If we have a delegation address set in the parameters, we assign it the whole VP | ||
// Then we reduce the VP from users who voted + VP from other delegators | ||
if (haveDelegationAddress) { | ||
|
||
// Fetch vp from users who voted | ||
userScores = userScores.filter((score) => Object.keys(score).length !== 0); | ||
|
||
// Assign the whole VP | ||
delegationSum[delegationAddressLc] = totalSupply; | ||
|
||
// Compute and remove VP from users who voted | ||
for (const userScore of userScores) { | ||
for (const obj of userScore) { | ||
for (const addr of Object.keys(obj)) { | ||
delegationSum[delegationAddressLc] -= obj[addr]; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Remove VP from other delegators | ||
for (const addr of Object.keys(delegationSum)) { | ||
if (addr.toLowerCase() === delegationAddressLc) { | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
delegationSum[delegationAddressLc] -= delegationSum[addr]; | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Checksum addresses | ||
const checksumAddresses: any = {}; | ||
for (const addr of Object.keys(delegationSum)) { | ||
checksumAddresses[getAddress(addr)] = delegationSum[addr]; | ||
} | ||
|
||
return checksumAddresses; | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @pierremarsotlyon1 Right now we are not accepting strategies that depend on other addresses to calculate voting power. these types of strategies are usually not scalable, you see some other way to handle this without depending on other voters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
https:/snapshot-labs/snapshot-strategies#code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @ChaituVR
I didn't really understand the issue here
I'm just calculating the voting power of each voters to calculate the voting power of another voter
Which is basically like calculate the voting power of each voters like all the other strategies
For example, if we have these voters : [0x1, 0x2, 0x3] and the strategy will want to calculate the voting power of 0x3 (based on strategy parameters), I will calculate the voting power of 0x1 and 0x2 to assign the voting power of 0x3
What's the issue here ?
and you already have few strategies with dependOnOtherAddress set at true like 'src/strategies/delegation/index.ts'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes we do have other 15 old strategies that depend on other addresses, but we stopped accepting new ones as they are not scalable and causing lot of trouble, one alternative way is running seperate server to return the voting power of addresses and using the strategy
api-v2-override
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But there is something that i don't understand
Currently, with your current default delegation strategy, how you reduce the delegation address voting power if there are some voters who delegated to the delegation address ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We calculate voting power for all addresses again (that's the pain problem 🙈 ), and then we will just ignore the voting power of the delegator who voted from the delegate's voting power
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it possible to calculate in a external server the voting power of each user and then compute the delegation address voting power in the strategy ?
the delegation address voting power will still be based on the voter addresses but at least the user voting power will be compute externally
So basically, the strategy will just fetch voting powers with an endpoint and then do plus/minus stuff
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Your strategy can do anything within limits mentioned here https:/snapshot-labs/snapshot-strategies#code just that depending on other addresses is not scalable for us
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, we're blocked with what we want to achieve and your requirements.
Is it really not possible to push this strat ?
Otherwise, is it possible to use your delegation strategy (like currently we have) but use a custom delegation contract address by the strategy settings ?
Or is it possible to add this logic on your side ?
Basically, our "custom" delegation contract will be the same as yours but with new functions