feat: split request params

[VishnuSanal]

Description

This PR fixes #850

Summary

This PR does split request params

PR Checklist

Please ensure that:

• The PR contains a descriptive title
• The PR contains a descriptive summary of the changes
• You build and test your changes before submitting a PR.
• You have added relevant documentation
• You have added relevant tests. We prefer integration tests wherever possible

Pre-Commit Instructions:

• Ensure that you have run the pre-commit hooks on your PR.

[vercel]

@VishnuSanal is attempting to deploy a commit to the sparckles Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[VishnuSanal]

@sansyrox, the tests pass here. can you PTAL at the interface + an initial review, if you will. :)

[codspeed-hq]

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #952 will not alter performance

_{Comparing VishnuSanal:split-request-params (a057d05) with main (74cdabf)}

Summary

✅ 116 untouched benchmarks

🆕 29 new benchmarks

Benchmarks breakdown

	Benchmark	main	VishnuSanal:split-request-params	Change
🆕	test_openapi_query_params	N/A	6.4 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_body[split_request_typed-async]	N/A	4.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_body[split_request_typed-sync]	N/A	4.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_body[split_request_untyped-async]	N/A	4.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_body[split_request_untyped-sync]	N/A	4.9 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_combined[split_request_typed-async]	N/A	5.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_combined[split_request_typed-sync]	N/A	5.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_combined[split_request_untyped-async]	N/A	5.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_combined[split_request_untyped-sync]	N/A	5.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_combined_failure[async]	N/A	5.1 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_combined_failure[sync]	N/A	5 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_headers[split_request_typed-async]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_headers[split_request_typed-sync]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_headers[split_request_untyped-async]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_headers[split_request_untyped-sync]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_method[split_request_typed-async]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_method[split_request_typed-sync]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_method[split_request_untyped-async]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_method[split_request_untyped-sync]	N/A	4.8 ms	N/A
🆕	test_split_request_params_get_path_params[split_request_typed-async]	N/A	4.9 ms	N/A
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

[sansyrox]

Hey @VishnuSanal 👋

I really like the current implementation. Great job ✨ But I have a few follow ups. I will share them in a few hours

[VishnuSanal]

• create custom type aliases & check them in the funciton signature

[sansyrox]

This should be just QueryParams. No?

[sansyrox]

@VishnuSanal , any update here?

[sansyrox]

Hey @VishnuSanal , some more work is needed here. Also , could you have a look at the conflicts?

[sansyrox]

Looks good to me 😄 Great job ✨

[VishnuSanal]

why is this not merged yet? 🤔