Any chance for a clang-tidy version of this repository?

[HappyCerberus]

The clang-format package and the corresponding hook are great.

I also rely on clang-tidy to enforce code style specifically through the readability-identifier-naming check.
However, there doesn't seem to be any freestanding package for clang-tidy that could be used with pre-commit.

Unfortunately, I have only minimal Python background so I'm unable to make a fork and do it myself.

[dokempf]

My guess is that this should be rather easy, as the LLVM build logic is already in place. I will have a closer look when I find the time, but I am currently on parental leave.

[mgeplf]

I vaguely remember looking at this several years ago; the reason I didn't end up doing it was that the wheel size would be so much larger (at the time, it was pulling in all of libLLVM, libclang-cpp, etc), and most distributions included clang-tidy in their clang installations.

Would still be neat.

but I am currently on parental leave.

Congrats!

[dokempf]

My first thought was to realize this as a separate Python package. With the executables being statically linked, there is no size synergy between the two anyway and the packages should install exactly the tool the name suggests.

[mgeplf]

My first thought was to realize this as a separate Python package.

That was my plan too. The size thing was even building it on its own. However, that was many years ago, so worth trying it again.

[narpfel]

I made the changes necessary to build clang-tidy here. Basically just s/format/tidy/.

However, the build times are considerably slower, so building in QEMU will take longer than the 6 hour limit for a single GH action workflow.

[fgrie]

However, the build times are considerably slower, so building in QEMU will take longer than the 6 hour limit for a single GH action workflow.

A clang-tidy package would be great for me too. What is your opinion on just skipping the build of QEMU platforms for now?

[dokempf]

What is your opinion on just skipping the build of QEMU platforms for now?

I am hesitant. Usage on these platforms might be rare, but pip would fall back to a source installation in these cases which will take an excessive amount of time to complete, which is not really acceptable for a pre-commit hook. I will have a look into setting up custom runners (never did that before).

[dokempf]

I built clang-tidy locally using @narpfel 's fork and realized another obstacle: The statically linked executable exceeds 100MB and will therefore not be uploadable to PyPI without special permit. Edit: It compresses better than I expected, so it might be possible to stay under the 60MB limit, but maybe not for all platforms.

[narpfel]

Would you be interested in one of these workarounds for the QEMU platforms?

• Including a pure Python shim that either calls the system clang-tidy or errors with a message explaining why clang-tidy currently can’t be built.
• Cross-compiling outside of cibuildwheel. This would probably require some work, especially if you want to maintain compatibility with an old manylinux standard.

Or would you say that setting up a self-hosted runner is easy enough to not justify the work on one of these workarounds?

Implementing cross-compilation directly in cibuildwheel unfortunately seems to have stalled: pypa/cibuildwheel#598 pypa/cibuildwheel#804

As for the wheel sizes, the largest wheel built here is 34 MB for i686, so there is quite a margin to the PyPI limit.

[renefritze]

I too had a need for the tidy version of this repo. So I went ahead and did the changes in my fork only to discover this issue afterwards 🙄

I'd be happy to transfer/share rights for the fork and pypi projects.

Or would you say that setting up a self-hosted runner is easy enough to not justify the work on one of these workarounds?

Setup is indeed very easy and I might even be able to provide VM to host a runner.

[dokempf]

Hey @renefritze - it's a small world. I am currently out of the office, but I would just call you some time end of the week or beginning of next week to discuss this.

[renefritze]

Indeed it is 😄
Monday/Wednesday would be best.

[dokempf]

So @renefritze and me have decided how to move this forward. There will be a repository similar to this one that is similarly maintained: https:/ssciwr/clang-tidy-wheel It will take us a few more days (or weeks) to get everything up and running (self-hosted runner). I will close this issue once we are done with the transition.