Add missing 'is_anonymous' property to the User type #872
Comments
dave-irvine
changed the title
kangmingtay
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 2, 2024
## What kind of change does this PR introduce? Types update ## What is the current behavior? User type is missing 'is_anonymous' property. ## What is the new behavior? User type has the 'is_anonymous' property. ## Additional context I'm not 100% certain if this property is optional or not, hoping @kangmingtay can offer some insight as they implemented the feature in supabase/auth#68 Fixes #872 --------- Co-authored-by: Kang Ming <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Chore
Describe the chore
The recently released supabase/auth#68 adds Anonymous Sign-In, but the types in this JS package do not reflect the change. The
Usertype should have theis_anonymousboolean property exposed.Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots that help clarify the task.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: