Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(schema): add helper functions for check and transform schema type #47

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 22, 2018

Conversation

easonlin404
Copy link
Member

@easonlin404 easonlin404 commented Feb 20, 2018

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 20, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #47 into master will increase coverage by 2.1%.
The diff coverage is 96.15%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #47     +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage   88.49%   90.6%   +2.1%     
========================================
  Files           4       5      +1     
  Lines         426     447     +21     
========================================
+ Hits          377     405     +28     
+ Misses         36      31      -5     
+ Partials       13      11      -2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
operation.go 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
property.go 52.17% <100%> (+0.17%) ⬆️
parser.go 84.45% <100%> (+3.72%) ⬆️
schema.go 95.45% <95.45%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9345ad4...7bb4f2b. Read the comment docs.

* up-master:
  feat: add nested "array of struct" field support (swaggo#46)
  feat: add nested "array of struct" field support (swaggo#48)

# Conflicts:
#	example/simple/docs/docs.go
#	parser.go
#	property.go
@easonlin404 easonlin404 merged commit c6c1ad9 into swaggo:master Feb 22, 2018
@easonlin404 easonlin404 deleted the feature/add-helper-func branch February 22, 2018 03:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bool not recognized as a valid type
2 participants