Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[QUESTION] The reason of using manyToMany relations instead of multi-select #13

Open
gplanchat opened this issue Dec 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

[QUESTION] The reason of using manyToMany relations instead of multi-select #13

gplanchat opened this issue Dec 16, 2016 · 1 comment
Labels
question

Comments

@gplanchat
Copy link
Contributor

gplanchat commented Dec 16, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Is there a special reason why the connector is using Select fields for pim_catalog_select attributes and ManyToMany fields with the LocalisedFallbackEntity for pim_ctaalog_multiselect ones ?

Was the MultiSelect type inappropriate ?
@Djamy
Copy link
Contributor

Djamy commented Dec 23, 2016

Could you give us more details on this question, please ?
Because this part was critical and we had to find a workaround with the Oro team about this.

@Djamy Djamy added the question label Jan 16, 2017
Djamy added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 14, 2017
@Djamy
Merged in dev/ftp-integration (pull request #13)
34a48ee 
Dev/ftp integration
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@gplanchat @Djamy