Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ERROR Unable to find tree root #2

Closed
hroncok opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

ERROR Unable to find tree root #2

hroncok opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor

hroncok commented Sep 6, 2019

[python-virtualenv (py34-patch %)]$ git remote -v
churchyard	ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/forks/churchyard/rpms/python-virtualenv.git (fetch)
churchyard	ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/forks/churchyard/rpms/python-virtualenv.git (push)
origin	ssh://[email protected]/rpms/python-virtualenv (fetch)
origin	ssh://[email protected]/rpms/python-virtualenv (push)
[python-virtualenv (py34-patch %)]$ git branch 
  16.6.1
  master
  nopy2
* py34-patch
  test38
  you_shall_not_pass
[python-virtualenv (py34-patch %)]$ tmt discover
 ERROR  Unable to find tree root for '/home/churchyard/rpmbuild/fedora-scm/python-virtualenv'.
@psss
Copy link
Collaborator

psss commented Sep 6, 2019

This means no config was found. Just enter one of the directories with examples for quick experimenting. The message should say more clearly that no metadata have been found.

@psss psss self-assigned this Sep 6, 2019
@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor Author

hroncok commented Sep 8, 2019

Oh. this is maybe a mismatch of expectations and reality then. i came to test this tool on my package with CI.

@psss
Copy link
Collaborator

psss commented Sep 10, 2019

I see. This is for now just a very early prototype, basically an outline. To start somewhere and give idea of how the command line interface could/would look like. Feel free to comment drafted options/subcommands if something like that would work for you. Also, so far we haven't planned support for the Standard Test Interface. We can consider later to provide some kind of backward-compatibility support as well.

@hroncok
Copy link
Contributor Author

hroncok commented Sep 10, 2019

Can I use the test metadata specification (L1 and L2) to define my Fedora CI tests today?

@psss
Copy link
Collaborator

psss commented Sep 10, 2019

Not yet, but we're getting close. At Flock we've presented a simple prototype for github pull requests with packit integration. Fedora CI and RHEL CI are our next steps where we want to enable this. This library/tool will be part of that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants