Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't hard-code the name of the webhook service #1724

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2019

Conversation

imjasonh
Copy link
Member

@imjasonh imjasonh commented Dec 10, 2019

This allows users to rename the service and deployment, so long as they
also update the env var value specified in webhook.yaml

More progress toward #1713
cc @silverlyra

Submitter Checklist

These are the criteria that every PR should meet, please check them off as you
review them:

See the contribution guide for more details.

Double check this list of stuff that's easy to miss:

Reviewer Notes

If API changes are included, additive changes must be approved by at least two OWNERS and backwards incompatible changes must be approved by more than 50% of the OWNERS, and they must first be added in a backwards compatible way.

Release Notes

The webhook service and deployment can have a name specified by the user.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from dlorenc and a user December 10, 2019 16:43
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit label Dec 10, 2019
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 10, 2019
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member

/hold

@imjasonh do we want webhook-asdfasdf in there though ? 😅

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 10, 2019
This allows users to rename the service and deployment, so long as they
also update the env var value specified in webhook.yaml
@imjasonh
Copy link
Member Author

Whooooops! Good catch. Fixed.

Copy link
Member

@vdemeester vdemeester left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold cancel
/meow

@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 10, 2019
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: cat image

In response to this:

/lgtm
/hold cancel
/meow

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2019
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 10, 2019
@imjasonh
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 68732f6 into tektoncd:master Dec 10, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cla: yes Trying to make the CLA bot happy with ppl from different companies work on one commit lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants