test: implement simulation functions #83
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #83 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 56.88% 62.88% +5.99%
==========================================
Files 24 25 +1
Lines 1830 1972 +142
==========================================
+ Hits 1041 1240 +199
+ Misses 682 622 -60
- Partials 107 110 +3
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
* master: fix: solve module, sdk issues test: improve code coverage test: add cli integration tests test: add integration cli test for ratio plan, stake, and unstake refactor: update description and use string slice flag for harvest for better developer experience feat: add integration test for create fixed amount plan command-line interface
…ctor, add workflow
…64-simulation-test * commit '6dea151437ce42ffd0b68c5486fa210195ce6696': feat: add genesis functionality (tendermint#87)
… work in progress to solve harvest issue
|
I will close this PR since it doesn't need two different PRs to implement simulation tests. I initially thought there wouldn't be any merge conflicts for public plans implementation but I realize there will be many conflicts when implementing the logics. Since #98 is continuation of this PR, I will move there to continue. |
Description
closes: #64
Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.
docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)godoccomments.Files changedin the Github PR explorerCodecov Reportin the comment section below once CI passes