Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delegate to Traverse.sequence in Applicative.sequence #883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2016

Conversation

ceedubs
Copy link
Contributor

@ceedubs ceedubs commented Feb 16, 2016

The previous approach duplicated the implementation of sequence, which
is a slight code stink. More importantly though, this approach will
benefit from an optimized override implementation of sequence if the
Traverse instance has one.

The previous approach duplicated the implementation of `sequence`, which
is a slight code stink. More importantly though, this approach will
benefit from an optimized override implementation of `sequence` if the
`Traverse` instance has one.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Current coverage is 89.34%

Merging #883 into master will not affect coverage as of c349c05

@@            master    #883   diff @@
======================================
  Files          169     169       
  Stmts         2337    2337       
  Branches        75      75       
  Methods          0       0       
======================================
  Hit           2088    2088       
  Partial          0       0       
  Missed         249     249       

Review entire Coverage Diff as of c349c05

Powered by Codecov. Updated on successful CI builds.

@julien-truffaut
Copy link
Contributor

👍

1 similar comment
@adelbertc
Copy link
Contributor

👍

adelbertc added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2016
Delegate to Traverse.sequence in Applicative.sequence
@adelbertc adelbertc merged commit 6fe593d into typelevel:master Feb 17, 2016
@ceedubs ceedubs deleted the app-sequence branch February 18, 2016 18:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants