Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question #798

Open
zju-lyx opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

question #798

zju-lyx opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@zju-lyx
Copy link

zju-lyx commented Oct 10, 2024

When calculating the Qini score, we use the area under the Qini curve and subtract the random value. In the code, we generate a Qini curve by assigning random scores to each sample and then use the area under this curve as the random value. However, in many cases, the random value is directly set to 0.5. There is a significant difference between these two methods of calculation. How should we understand this discrepancy?

@jeongyoonlee
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for your question, @zju-lyx. We updated the uplift/Qini curve and score calculation to use the theoretical random instead of the sampled random in #799. With the change, the normalized AUUC and Qini scores for random are always 0.5 and 0.0, respectively.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants