CI: compute individual binary sizes

[miles170]

We need this PR to be merged before checking the binary size. See #4693

[sylvestre]

A few comments

• Looks like they all have the same sha:

• could you please sort the program by order ?

• could you please store the size in byte ? (I guess it is kb here)

  "tr": {
  "sha": "ff3a35bb658665667961061acafeff72ea9230be",
  "size": 784
  },
  "tee": {
  "sha": "ff3a35bb658665667961061acafeff72ea9230be",
  "size": 744
  },
  "cp": {
  "sha": "ff3a35bb658665667961061acafeff72ea9230be",
  "size": 1048
  },

[miles170]

A few comments

• Looks like they all have the same sha:
• could you please sort the program by order ?
• could you please store the size in byte ? (I guess it is kb here)
  "tr": {
  "sha": "ff3a35bb658665667961061acafeff72ea9230be",
  "size": 784
  },
  "tee": {
  "sha": "ff3a35bb658665667961061acafeff72ea9230be",
  "size": 744
  },
  "cp": {
  "sha": "ff3a35bb658665667961061acafeff72ea9230be",
  "size": 1048
  },

1. Would you want me to put sha in top order? Something like the following

"sha": "ff3a35bb658665667961061acafeff72ea9230be",
"tr": 784,
"tee": 744,
"cp": 1048,

2. Should I also change the size-result.json size unit to byte?

[sylvestre]

ok, let's keep kbyte then, sorry

I thought it was the hash of the binary. not the commit hash. So, yeah, your plan looks great.

[github-actions]

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/tail-2/inotify-dir-recreate. tests/tail-2/inotify-dir-recreate is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?

[sylvestre]

I still see the sha for each program

"arch": {
  "sha": "8e7143d503f701e2d5bc6b9c3fe475ac459a9e9f",
  "size": 684
},

[miles170]

I still see the sha for each program

"arch": {
  "sha": "8e7143d503f701e2d5bc6b9c3fe475ac459a9e9f",
  "size": 684
},

I apologize for my carelessness.

[sylvestre]

perfect, thanks

{
  "Sat, 15 Apr 2023 11:21:58 +0000": {
    "sha": "eafa220845212a6393008b419ff063b70e5d3175",
    "sizes": {
      "[": 724,
      "arch": 684,
      "base32": 808,
      "base64": 808,
      "basename": 708,
      "basenc": 820,
      "cat": 736,
      "chgrp": 776,
      "chmod": 740,
      "chown": 784,
[...]

[sylvestre]

it would be nice to graph the evolution of each binaries over time :)
https:/uutils/coreutils-tracking

[miles170]

it would be nice to graph the evolution of each binaries over time :) https:/uutils/coreutils-tracking

I can work on this.