Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Determine how to handle "non-preferred" media types #873

Closed
mattgarrish opened this issue Nov 12, 2018 · 0 comments
Closed

Determine how to handle "non-preferred" media types #873

mattgarrish opened this issue Nov 12, 2018 · 0 comments
Labels
spec: EPUB 3.2 Impacting the support of EPUB 3.2 status: has PR The issue is being processed in a pull request
Milestone
4.2.0-RC

Comments

@mattgarrish
Copy link
Member

In a number of cases, more than one media type is allowed for a resource type, with the first one listed being the "preferred" media type. Use of the older media types must not result in a warning, but probably should be noted in informative output.

Reference: https://w3c.github.io/publ-epub-revision/epub32/spec/epub-spec.html#sec-cmt-supported
@mattgarrish mattgarrish added spec: EPUB 3.2 Impacting the support of EPUB 3.2 status: accepted Ready to be further processed labels Nov 12, 2018
@rdeltour rdeltour added this to the 4.2.0-RC milestone Feb 25, 2019
rdeltour added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 16, 2019
@rdeltour
feat: report use of non-preferred Core Media Types
1f08506 
Report a new `USAGE` message, `OPF-090`, when a Package Doc item is
declared with a Core Media Type which has an alternative preferred media
type.

Fix #873
@rdeltour rdeltour mentioned this issue Mar 16, 2019
Merged
@rdeltour rdeltour added status: has PR The issue is being processed in a pull request and removed status: accepted Ready to be further processed labels Mar 16, 2019
rdeltour added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 17, 2019
@rdeltour
feat: report use of non-preferred Core Media Types
ab13779 
Report a new `USAGE` message, `OPF-090`, when a Package Doc item is
declared with a Core Media Type which has an alternative preferred media
type.

Fix #873
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec: EPUB 3.2 Impacting the support of EPUB 3.2 status: has PR The issue is being processed in a pull request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.2.0-RC
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rdeltour @mattgarrish