Update the bullet items on scripts and wasm

[iherman]

Referring back to the discussion in w3c/epub-specs#2655.

---

Preview | Diff

[iherman]

@bduga would be great to get your reaction as well!

[bduga]

This seems fine to me, with Matt's clarification. I guess the only thing I disagree with is needing to add it to a new charter. It seems clear to me that wasm is already allowed, so we would only be clarifying that, which doesn't seem like a level 4 change. But also no harm adding it.

[wareid]

Approved with Matt's clarification

[iherman]

This seems fine to me, with Matt's clarification. I guess the only thing I disagree with is needing to add it to a new charter. It seems clear to me that wasm is already allowed, so we would only be clarifying that, which doesn't seem like a level 4 change.

As I said in w3c/epub-specs#2655 (comment) this may be interpreted as class 4 and may lead to discussions...

But also no harm adding it.

Better safe than sorry :-)

[iherman]

Merging outstanding PRs before it becomes unmanageable....