Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Mode and Lisk chain definitions #2817

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 3, 2024
Merged

Conversation

0xArdy
Copy link
Contributor

@0xArdy 0xArdy commented Oct 3, 2024

Fixed Mode and Lisk chain definitions.

Lisk contracts: https://docs.lisk.com/contracts


PR-Codex overview

This PR introduces updates to the mode and lisk chain definitions, enhancing their configurations by adding contract details and a sourceId for the mainnet.

Detailed summary

  • In src/chains/definitions/mode.ts:

    • Added sourceId definition.
    • Included contracts from chainConfig.
  • In src/chains/definitions/lisk.ts:

    • Added sourceId definition.
    • Included contracts from chainConfig.
    • Added l2OutputOracle, portal, and l1StandardBridge contracts with sourceId addresses.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 3, 2024

@0xArdy is attempting to deploy a commit to the Wevm Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 3, 2024

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 419dc94

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 1 package
Name Type
viem Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@jxom jxom merged commit 7c3653b into wevm:main Oct 3, 2024
21 of 35 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Oct 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants