Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GLIBC_2.18 requirement #25

Closed
andrewcartwright1 opened this issue Mar 3, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

GLIBC_2.18 requirement #25

andrewcartwright1 opened this issue Mar 3, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@andrewcartwright1
Copy link

andrewcartwright1 commented Mar 3, 2021

Hi,

Was just wondering if there's a way to use an older version of GLIBC? Cent OS 7 currently only offers 2.17, when running this I'm getting errors because GLIBC 2.18 is missing - I am looking at using the Java package on a linux machine running Cent OS 7.

Thank you

@andrewcartwright1
Copy link
Author

Just realized, I forgot to add a stack trace for this, sorry about that.

image

@wilsonzlin
Copy link
Owner

I'm not too sure how to do this, but from some cursory searches on Google this might be very difficult. An alternative can be to build against musl instead, which statically links libc. I probably won't add this to the pipeline as that would increase complexity significantly but this can be done by building from source if desired.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants