Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Coverity CID: 220431] Extra argument to printf format specifier in tests/lib/sprintf/src/main.c #33805

Closed
zephyrbot opened this issue Mar 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug

Comments

@zephyrbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Static code scan issues found in file:

https:/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/tree/169144afa1826511ee6ec3f53d590b2c0d39d3d4/tests/lib/sprintf/src/main.c#L751

Category: API usage errors
Function: test_print
Component: Tests
CID: 220431

Details:

ret = fprintf(stdout, "", i);

745         ret = fprintf(stdout,  "%d", i);
746         zassert_equal(ret, 1, "fprintf failed!");
747    
748         ret = fprintf(p,  "%d", i);
749         zassert_not_equal(ret, 1, "fprintf failed!");
750    
>>>     CID 220431:  API usage errors  (PRINTF_ARGS)
>>>     This argument was not used by the format string: "i". [Note: The source code implementation of the function has been overridden by a builtin model.]
751         ret = fprintf(stdout,  "", i);
752         zassert_not_equal(ret, 1, "fprintf failed!");
753    
754         ret = printf("%d", 3);
755         zassert_equal(ret, 1, "printf failed!");
756    

Please fix or provide comments in coverity using the link:

https://scan9.coverity.com/reports.htm#v29271/p12996

Note: This issue was created automatically. Priority was set based on classification
of the file affected and the impact field in coverity. Assignees were set using the CODEOWNERS file.

@zephyrbot zephyrbot added bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug labels Mar 29, 2021
@nashif nashif assigned xiaofst and unassigned nashif Mar 29, 2021
@enjiamai enjiamai assigned enjiamai and unassigned xiaofst Apr 3, 2021
@galak
Copy link
Collaborator

galak commented Apr 9, 2021

Not a bug, this test is trying to validate we get an error reported in this case.

@galak galak closed this as completed Apr 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug The issue is a bug, or the PR is fixing a bug Coverity A Coverity detected issue or its fix priority: low Low impact/importance bug
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants