Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

macro replacement for Jacobi elliptic function #21

Closed
poortho opened this issue Aug 14, 2015 · 8 comments
Closed

macro replacement for Jacobi elliptic function #21

poortho opened this issue Aug 14, 2015 · 8 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@poortho
Copy link

poortho commented Aug 14, 2015

{\rm sn}(x,k) -> \Jacobisn@{x}{k}

This is an example with more than one argument.

@poortho
Copy link
Author

poortho commented Mar 24, 2016

Does the sn have to be sn or can it be anything else?

@HowardCohl
Copy link
Member

Look here:

http://dlmf.nist.gov/22.1#p2.t1.r2

Then have a look at the paragraph starting with The functions treated

@poortho
Copy link
Author

poortho commented Mar 24, 2016

Should I include all of the listed versions or just the three principal ones?

@HowardCohl
Copy link
Member

It's not going to matter too much, because this will be handled by the csv file.

@HowardCohl
Copy link
Member

So, I think, after you complete this issue, then you can move onto issue #9.

We may need to discuss this, but read the issue very carefully.

@physikerwelt physikerwelt added this to the long-term milestone Apr 1, 2016
physikerwelt added a commit that referenced this issue May 3, 2016
Add csv file support and solve issues #26, #21, #20, #19, and #24
@poortho
Copy link
Author

poortho commented May 5, 2016

Finished with pull request #41

@poortho poortho closed this as completed May 5, 2016
@HowardCohl
Copy link
Member

@ClaudeZou @physikerwelt This should be added on the texer repo. Has it?

@poortho
Copy link
Author

poortho commented May 11, 2016

This issue was moved to DRMF/texer#4

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants