Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gcoap/forward_proxy: handle timeout case #20915

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fabian18
Copy link
Contributor

Contribution description

Handle when the CoAP forward proxy is not getting a response from the remote server, by sending a RST message to the client, so it will not wait further for a response.

Testing procedure

We used nanocoap client and the proxy without uplink connection. So the request will timeout and the client will get a RST.

Issues/PRs references

#20910

@github-actions github-actions bot added Area: network Area: Networking Area: CoAP Area: Constrained Application Protocol implementations Area: sys Area: System labels Oct 16, 2024
@benpicco benpicco changed the title gcoap/farward_proxy: handle timeout case gcoap/forward_proxy: handle timeout case Oct 16, 2024
@benpicco benpicco added Type: bug The issue reports a bug / The PR fixes a bug (including spelling errors) CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR labels Oct 16, 2024
@riot-ci
Copy link

riot-ci commented Oct 18, 2024

Murdock results

✔️ PASSED

224fdb2 gcoap/farward_proxy: handle timeout case

Success Failures Total Runtime
10215 0 10215 15m:15s

Artifacts

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: CoAP Area: Constrained Application Protocol implementations Area: network Area: Networking Area: sys Area: System CI: ready for build If set, CI server will compile all applications for all available boards for the labeled PR Type: bug The issue reports a bug / The PR fixes a bug (including spelling errors)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants