Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AsyncAPI spec v3 support in Glee #457

Closed
7 tasks done
Tracked by #518 ...
jonaslagoni opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #549
Closed
7 tasks done
Tracked by #518 ...

AsyncAPI spec v3 support in Glee #457

jonaslagoni opened this issue Jun 5, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by #549
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released

Comments

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

jonaslagoni commented Jun 5, 2023

Reason/Context

This Issue is used to track changes needed to support AsyncAPI v3. As a code owner, please edit this list of TODO tasks in order to properly track the progress 🙂 Once this issue is closed it means that v3 is now fully supported in this library.

Remaining tasks:

@KhudaDad414
Copy link
Member

/progress 90
after adding support for v3 of parser, Spec 3 version will be supported by default.

@fmvilas
Copy link
Member

fmvilas commented Oct 25, 2023

@KhudaDad414 don't forget to support new features like request/reply. That support won't be implicit.

@KhudaDad414
Copy link
Member

KhudaDad414 commented Nov 6, 2023

/progress 80

implementation is done #551 . working on docs.

@KhudaDad414 KhudaDad414 self-assigned this Nov 6, 2023
@KhudaDad414
Copy link
Member

/progress 90

PR #551 is ready for review.

@fmvilas fmvilas closed this as completed Nov 21, 2023
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 0.37.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request released
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants