Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.14](backport #39087) Migrate packetbeat to static Buildkite pipeline #39108

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 22, 2024

Conversation

dliappis
Copy link
Contributor

@dliappis dliappis commented Apr 22, 2024

Proposed commit message

This commit refactors the packetbeat pipeline to the pipeline selector
approach as laid out in #38783.

Related issues

Logs

Cherry-picked from 8f8f313

This commit refactors the packetbeat pipeline to the pipeline selector
approach as laid out in elastic#38783.

Relates elastic/ingest-dev#3072
@dliappis dliappis self-assigned this Apr 22, 2024
@dliappis dliappis requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2024 11:12
@botelastic botelastic bot added needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label and removed needs_team Indicates that the issue/PR needs a Team:* label labels Apr 22, 2024
@dliappis dliappis changed the title Backport packetbeat 39087 to 8.14 Backport packetbeat #39087 to 8.14 Apr 22, 2024
@dliappis dliappis changed the title Backport packetbeat #39087 to 8.14 [8.14](backport #39087) Migrate packetbeat to static Buildkite pipeline #39108 Apr 22, 2024
@dliappis dliappis changed the title [8.14](backport #39087) Migrate packetbeat to static Buildkite pipeline #39108 [8.14](backport #39087) Migrate packetbeat to static Buildkite pipeline Apr 22, 2024
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

elasticmachine commented Apr 22, 2024

💚 Build Succeeded

the below badges are clickable and redirect to their specific view in the CI or DOCS
Pipeline View Test View Changes Artifacts preview preview

Expand to view the summary

Build stats

  • Duration: 13 min 0 sec

❕ Flaky test report

No test was executed to be analysed.

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

To re-run your PR in the CI, just comment with:

  • /test : Re-trigger the build.

  • /package : Generate the packages and run the E2E tests.

  • /beats-tester : Run the installation tests with beats-tester.

  • run elasticsearch-ci/docs : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

@dliappis dliappis added aws Enable builds in the CI for aws cloud testing :Windows arm Enable builds in the CI for ARM testing macOS Enable builds in the CI for darwin testing labels Apr 22, 2024
@dliappis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@pkoutsovasilis as discussed offline, there is some flakiness with the Python test tests/system/test_file_integrity.py for auditbeat, see e.g. https://buildkite.com/elastic/auditbeat/builds/4174#018f058e-280e-4752-bef4-43edf8886b95/160-343 .
It's been spotted in this PR, but also other PRs. Note that this PR is against 8.14 but we've noticed it also in other branches.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
arm Enable builds in the CI for ARM testing aws Enable builds in the CI for aws cloud testing backport macOS Enable builds in the CI for darwin testing Team:Ingest-EngProd :Windows
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants