Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add an option to supress output #538

Closed
jisensee opened this issue Dec 7, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Add an option to supress output #538

jisensee opened this issue Dec 7, 2016 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement Feature request has-pull-request

Comments

@jisensee
Copy link

jisensee commented Dec 7, 2016

Currently the module prints some stuff on the console, like "packaging app for ...". It would be nice if I could pass an option which disables this behaviour.
@malept malept added the enhancement Feature request label Dec 7, 2016
@malept
Copy link
Member

malept commented Dec 7, 2016

Electron Forge actually could use this.

@malept malept mentioned this issue Dec 9, 2016
Merged
@malept
Copy link
Member

malept commented Dec 9, 2016

I have a pull request in #541.

malept added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2016
@malept
Add quiet option
4168c52 
When set, this prevents printing Electron Packager specific warnings and
informational messages to the console. This does *not* disable errors.

Fixes #538.
malept added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 9, 2016
@malept
Add quiet option (#541)
e3ec883 
When set, this prevents printing Electron Packager specific warnings and
informational messages to the console. This does *not* disable errors.

Fixes #538.
@jisensee
Copy link
Author

jisensee commented Dec 9, 2016

Awesome, thanks a lot!

@luizfernandorg luizfernandorg mentioned this issue Jun 21, 2023
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement Feature request has-pull-request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@malept @jisensee