invalid struct naming for response: defined as "%s", but it should be named with "Res" suffix like "XxxRes" #2976

aguang1203 · 2023-09-21T01:18:04Z

…r strict route function

TENX-S · 2023-09-22T07:45:57Z

Can you release a patch for this fix? Thanks! @gqcn

…r strict route function (#2977)

gqcn changed the title ~~异常信息：invalid struct naming for response: defined as "%s", but it should be named with "Res" suffix like "XxxRes"~~ invalid struct naming for response: defined as "%s", but it should be named with "Res" suffix like "XxxRes" Sep 21, 2023

gqcn closed this as completed Sep 21, 2023

gqcn added question bug It is confirmed a bug, but don't worry, we'll handle it. and removed question labels Sep 21, 2023

gqcn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 21, 2023

fix isue #2976, to be compatible with bad response type definition fo…

7619287

…r strict route function

gqcn added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 25, 2023

fix isue #2976, to be compatible with bad response type definition fo…

df92c48

…r strict route function (#2977)

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

invalid struct naming for response: defined as "%s", but it should be named with "Res" suffix like "XxxRes" #2976

invalid struct naming for response: defined as "%s", but it should be named with "Res" suffix like "XxxRes" #2976

aguang1203 commented Sep 21, 2023

TENX-S commented Sep 22, 2023

invalid struct naming for response: defined as "%s", but it should be named with "Res" suffix like "XxxRes" #2976

invalid struct naming for response: defined as "%s", but it should be named with "Res" suffix like "XxxRes" #2976

Comments

aguang1203 commented Sep 21, 2023

TENX-S commented Sep 22, 2023