Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tlul] V2(S) Signoff #21020

Closed
msfschaffner opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed

[tlul] V2(S) Signoff #21020

msfschaffner opened this issue Jan 25, 2024 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Component:DV DV issue: testbench, test case, etc. IP:tlul Type:Signoff

Comments

@msfschaffner
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Ensure V2(S) signoff criteria are still maintained (this is not a focus area block).

@msfschaffner msfschaffner added this to the Earlgrey-PROD.M2 milestone Jan 25, 2024
@msfschaffner msfschaffner self-assigned this Jan 25, 2024
@msfschaffner msfschaffner added the Component:DV DV issue: testbench, test case, etc. label Jan 25, 2024
@msfschaffner
Copy link
Contributor Author

Commits since Earlgrey-ES tapeout

$ git rev-parse --short HEAD

9935a46

$ git log Earlgrey-M2.5.2-RC0..HEAD --oneline hw/ip/tlul

698dcc3 [tlul] Choose valid default depths
2f8cd83 [tlul/rtl] Change ASSERT_I to ASSERT to fix erroneous assertion failure
7688e71 [reggen] Add initial support for version and cip_id hjson fields
fbd888e Revert "[reggen] Add CIP_IDs and bump all major versions"
ff2314b [doc,report] Fix the dvsim report links to the testplans
0ba10b3 [reggen] Add CIP_IDs and bump all major versions
249bddb [chip,dv] update constraint with short_xbar_test
09a2f13 [chip,dv] add short iteration option to xbar test

Issues closed since the Earlgrey-ES tapeout

Currently open issues

Coverage report from 02/18/2024

xbar_main

image

xbar_peri

image

Summary

The only fix that had RTL impact was the removal of devmode, which does not have DV impact since it was never used.
V2S coverage levels are still fulfilled in the XBAR testbenches and the adapter modules for TLUL are covered as part of the individual IPs where they are instantiated.

The IP therefore still fulfills V2S quality level ( unless we decide that needs an RTL fix #8815, which does not look likely at this point).

@msfschaffner
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andreaskurth @GregAC @vogelpi can you PTAL?

@andreaskurth
Copy link
Contributor

With the same conditions and analysis as for the D2(S) signoff review I did, I agree that tlul fulfills the V2S signoff criteria for this release.

@vogelpi
Copy link
Contributor

vogelpi commented Feb 23, 2024

I agree with @andreaskurth , this still fulfills V2S. Thanks for putting this together @msfschaffner !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component:DV DV issue: testbench, test case, etc. IP:tlul Type:Signoff
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants