feat: implement fallback address #12
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates have introduced a new Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/forwarding/types/account.go (1)
17-18: The modification to include afallbackparameter inGenerateAddressis correctly implemented. However, consider reviewing the performance implications of concatenating strings for address generation.
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (5)
x/forwarding/types/account.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/forwarding/types/packet.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/forwarding/types/query.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/forwarding/types/query.pb.gw.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gw.gox/forwarding/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (15)
- api/noble/forwarding/v1/account.pulsar.go (16 hunks)
- api/noble/forwarding/v1/packet.pulsar.go (14 hunks)
- api/noble/forwarding/v1/query.pulsar.go (14 hunks)
- api/noble/forwarding/v1/tx.pulsar.go (28 hunks)
- proto/noble/forwarding/v1/account.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/noble/forwarding/v1/packet.proto (1 hunks)
- proto/noble/forwarding/v1/query.proto (2 hunks)
- proto/noble/forwarding/v1/tx.proto (2 hunks)
- x/forwarding/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
- x/forwarding/keeper/msg_server.go (5 hunks)
- x/forwarding/keeper/query_server.go (4 hunks)
- x/forwarding/middleware.go (2 hunks)
- x/forwarding/module.go (5 hunks)
- x/forwarding/types/account.go (1 hunks)
- x/forwarding/types/expected_keepers.go (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (2)
- api/noble/forwarding/v1/query.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
- api/noble/forwarding/v1/tx.pulsar.go: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments not posted (69)
proto/noble/forwarding/v1/packet.proto (1)
10-10: The addition of thefallbackfield toRegisterAccountDatais correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.proto/noble/forwarding/v1/account.proto (1)
19-19: The addition of thefallbackfield toForwardingAccountis correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.x/forwarding/types/expected_keepers.go (1)
25-25: The addition of theSendCoinsmethod to theBankKeeperinterface is correctly implemented and essential for handling fallback logic in account clearing.proto/noble/forwarding/v1/tx.proto (1)
31-31: The addition of thefallbackfield toMsgRegisterAccountis correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.x/forwarding/keeper/query_server.go (2)
6-8: Updating the error handling imports and types is a good practice to maintain consistency and clarity in error management.
17-25: The integration of thefallbackparameter in theAddressmethod is correctly implemented, enhancing the query capabilities to handle fallback addresses.proto/noble/forwarding/v1/query.proto (2)
17-17: Updating the API endpoint to include the{fallback}path parameter enhances the flexibility and functionality of the address query, aligning with the PR's objectives.
39-39: The addition of thefallbackfield to theQueryAddressmessage is correctly implemented, allowing for enhanced query capabilities.x/forwarding/keeper/msg_server.go (3)
22-27: The handling of thefallbackaddress in theRegisterAccountmethod is correctly implemented, enhancing the account registration process.
50-52: Correctly updating the account with thefallbackaddress during registration ensures robustness in account management.
106-115: The logic to handle clearing the account balance to a fallback account if specified is correctly implemented. However, verify the intended use of the booleanfallbackfield inMsgClearAccount, as it seems inconsistent with other implementations.Verification successful
The output from the script provides extensive references to the
MsgClearAccountstructure and its usage across various files in the codebase. The focus of the review comment was on the booleanfallbackfield within theMsgClearAccountmessage, specifically questioning its intended use and consistency with other implementations.From the script output, it's evident that the
fallbackfield is indeed a boolean and is used in various parts of the codebase, particularly in the context of clearing accounts. The field is accessed and manipulated in several places, indicating its active role in the logic of account management.Given the information from the script output, it seems that the
fallbackfield is consistently used as a boolean across the codebase, and its role in the logic for clearing accounts to a fallback address (if specified) is implemented as intended in the snippet provided in the review comment.Therefore, the review comment's concern about verifying the intended use of the
fallbackfield appears to be addressed by the evidence from the script output. The usage is consistent and aligns with the implementation in the provided code snippet.Based on this analysis, the review comment is consistent with the codebase, and the implementation of the
fallbacklogic in theMsgClearAccountis correct.Final Response:
The usage of the boolean
fallbackfield inMsgClearAccountis consistent across the codebase and aligns with the implementation in the provided code snippet. The logic for handling the account balance clearing to a fallback account, if specified, is correctly implemented.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the boolean `fallback` field in `MsgClearAccount`. # Test: Search for the usage of the `fallback` field in `MsgClearAccount`. Expect: Clarification on the boolean usage. rg --type go $'MsgClearAccount'Length of output: 24941
x/forwarding/middleware.go (2)
82-82: Ensure proper error handling for theRegisterAccountmethod.Verification successful
The additional context provided from the script output clearly shows how the
errvariable, which captures potential errors from theRegisterAccountmethod, is handled in both occurrences within themiddleware.gofile:
In the first occurrence, if an error occurs (
if err != nil), the function returns an error acknowledgement (return channeltypes.NewErrorAcknowledgement(err)). This indicates that the error is not ignored and is appropriately handled by signaling an error state upstream.In the second occurrence, the error handling is similar. If
erris not nil, it returns an error acknowledgement. If no error occurs (elseclause), it proceeds to return a result acknowledgement with the address, which is a successful outcome.Both cases demonstrate proper error handling as they ensure that errors are not only captured but also managed by returning an appropriate response based on the error state. This aligns with good practices in error management, where errors should not be silently ignored but should affect the control flow or output of the function.
Conclusion: The error handling for the
RegisterAccountmethod inmiddleware.gois implemented correctly and aligns with the expectations set in the review comment.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the error from `RegisterAccount` is handled appropriately in all usages. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Proper error handling in all occurrences. rg --type go $'m.keeper.RegisterAccount'Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract more context around the usage of `RegisterAccount` to verify error handling. # Extract 5 lines before and after the occurrences to see how errors are handled. rg --type go -C 5 'm.keeper.RegisterAccount' x/forwarding/middleware.goLength of output: 621
123-123: Ensure that theRegisterAccountmethod is robust against potential data inconsistencies, especially with the newfallbackfield.Verification successful
The
RegisterAccountmethod is indeed implemented and used within the codebase, specifically inx/forwarding/keeper/msg_server.go. The method is designed to handle requests to register accounts, and it interacts with various data structures that include thefallbackfield.To ensure robust handling of potential data inconsistencies, especially with the new
fallbackfield, it is recommended to review the specific error handling and validation mechanisms implemented in theRegisterAccountmethod inx/forwarding/keeper/msg_server.go. This review should focus on how the method processes thefallbackfield and other related data to prevent inconsistencies.
- File to review:
x/forwarding/keeper/msg_server.go- Method:
RegisterAccountScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `RegisterAccount` method handles potential data inconsistencies, especially with the new `fallback` field. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Robust handling of data inconsistencies. rg --type go $'m.keeper.RegisterAccount'Length of output: 190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the implementation of `m.keeper.RegisterAccount` to verify handling of data inconsistencies. # Search for the implementation of `m.keeper.RegisterAccount` and check for error handling or validations related to the `fallback` field. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func (m *Keeper) RegisterAccount($_, $_) { $$$ }'Length of output: 83
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Broaden the search to find any implementation or reference to `RegisterAccount` in the Go files. # Use a broader search pattern to locate any implementation or reference to `RegisterAccount`. rg --type go 'RegisterAccount'Length of output: 71206
x/forwarding/keeper/keeper.go (2)
35-35: Ensure that the newly added keepers are properly initialized and used throughout the system.Verification successful
The review comment concerning the initialization and usage of the newly added
types.AccountKeeperin thekeeper.gofile and related files has been verified. TheAccountKeeperis properly declared and utilized in multiple files within thex/forwardingdirectory, indicating correct integration into the system. Here are the specific points of integration:
- module.go: Declaration as part of a module structure.
- middleware.go: Used in the
NewMiddlewarefunction, indicating active usage.- keeper.go: Included in the keeper structure and also passed as a parameter, confirming its usage.
Overall, the integration of
types.AccountKeeperappears to be handled correctly across the system.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new keepers are properly initialized and used. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of the new keepers. Expect: Proper initialization and usage. rg --type go $'types.AccountKeeper'Length of output: 422
132-132: Check if theSendRestrictionFnmethod correctly handles the new forwarding logic, especially in scenarios where thetoAddrmight not be a forwarding account.Verification successful
The
SendRestrictionFnmethod inx/forwarding/keeper/keeper.gocorrectly handles the new forwarding logic. It checks if the recipient address (toAddr) is a forwarding account and appropriately handles cases where it is not, by returning the original address. This ensures that non-forwarding accounts are not incorrectly processed as forwarding accounts, aligning with the expected behavior.
- Location:
x/forwarding/keeper/keeper.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `SendRestrictionFn` method correctly handles the new forwarding logic. # Test: Search for the usage of `SendRestrictionFn`. Expect: Correct handling of forwarding logic. rg --type go $'k.SendRestrictionFn'Length of output: 135
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Inspect the implementation of `SendRestrictionFn` to verify its handling of forwarding logic. # Test: Search for the definition and usage context of `SendRestrictionFn`. rg --type go -C 10 $'func \(k \*Keeper\) SendRestrictionFn' x/forwarding/keeper/keeper.goLength of output: 819
x/forwarding/module.go (2)
37-37: Confirm that the module correctly implements theHasEndBlockerinterface, and that theEndBlockmethod is properly integrated into the module lifecycle.Verification successful
The verification process has confirmed that the
EndBlockmethod is indeed defined within theAppModuleclass in thex/forwarding/module.gofile. The method executes theExecuteForwardsfunction and then returnsnil, which aligns with typical lifecycle integration for such methods in Go modules.Given this information, it can be concluded that the
EndBlockmethod is properly integrated into the module lifecycle as required.Final Conclusion:
- The
EndBlockmethod is defined and appears to be correctly integrated within theAppModulelifecycle.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the `EndBlock` method is properly integrated into the module lifecycle. # Test: Search for the usage of `EndBlock`. Expect: Proper integration into the module lifecycle. rg --type go $'m.EndBlock'Length of output: 25
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the `EndBlock` method in Go files to verify its existence and integration points. # Test: Search for the definition of `EndBlock`. Expect to find its definition and clues about its integration. rg --type go -A 5 "func (.*EndBlock"Length of output: 111
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definition of the `EndBlock` method in Go files to verify its existence and integration points. # Test: Search for the definition of `EndBlock`. Expect to find its definition and clues about its integration. rg --type go -A 5 "func \(.*\) EndBlock"Length of output: 374
135-153: Review the CLI options for theClearAccountmethod to ensure they correctly handle the fallback functionality.Verification successful
The CLI options for the
ClearAccountmethod in themodule.gofile are configured to handle the fallback functionality as indicated by theFlagOptionsmap which includes a "fallback" key with a usage description. This setup appears to correctly implement the intended functionality for CLI interactions.
- Location:
x/forwarding/module.goScripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the CLI options for the `ClearAccount` method correctly handle the fallback functionality. # Test: Search for the CLI configuration of `ClearAccount`. Expect: Correct handling of fallback functionality. rg --type go $'ClearAccount'Length of output: 26571
api/noble/forwarding/v1/account.pulsar.go (13)
24-24: Added field descriptor forfallbackinForwardingAccount.
34-34: Initialized field descriptor forfallbackinForwardingAccount.
126-131: Added handling of thefallbackfield in theRangemethod offastReflection_ForwardingAccount. This ensures that thefallbackfield is considered when iterating over fields.
155-156: Added check for the presence of thefallbackfield in theHasmethod. This is crucial for correctly reporting whether thefallbackfield is populated.
181-182: Added logic to clear thefallbackfield in theClearmethod. This is necessary for properly managing the state of thefallbackfield.
211-213: Added retrieval of thefallbackfield value in theGetmethod. This ensures that thefallbackfield can be accessed correctly.
242-243: Added logic to set thefallbackfield value in theSetmethod. This is essential for correctly updating thefallbackfield.
275-276: Confirmed that thefallbackfield is not mutable, which is consistent with the design of other similar fields in the message.
299-300: Ensured that a new, default value for thefallbackfield can be created. This is important for initializing the field when needed.
385-388: Updated theSizemethod to account for thefallbackfield. This ensures that the size calculation includes thefallbackfield when it is populated.
418-424: Updated theMarshalmethod to include thefallbackfield. This ensures that thefallbackfield is correctly serialized.
626-657: Updated theUnmarshalmethod to correctly parse thefallbackfield. This is crucial for correctly deserializing thefallbackfield from the protobuf data.
Line range hint
715-771: Added thefallbackfield to theForwardingAccountstruct and provided a getter method. This integrates thefallbackfield into the data model.api/noble/forwarding/v1/packet.pulsar.go (14)
19-19: Addition offd_RegisterAccountData_fallbackfield descriptor is consistent with the PR's objective to handle fallback addresses.
27-27: Ensure that the initialization offd_RegisterAccountData_fallbackis correctly linked to theRegisterAccountDatamessage descriptor.
107-112: Proper handling of theFallbackfield in theRangemethod ensures that the field is considered when iterating over fields.
132-133: Correct implementation of theHasmethod for theFallbackfield to check its presence.
154-155: Clear method for theFallbackfield is implemented correctly to allow clearing the field value.
178-180: Getter for theFallbackfield is implemented correctly, ensuring it returns the correct value or an empty string if not set.
205-206: Setter for theFallbackfield is correctly implemented, ensuring the field can be set appropriately.
231-232: TheMutablemethod correctly panics for theFallbackfield, which is expected behavior as per protobuf specifications for scalar fields.
250-251: TheNewFieldmethod correctly returns a new default value for theFallbackfield.
329-332: Size calculation for theFallbackfield is correctly implemented in theProtoMethodssize function.
362-368: Marshalling of theFallbackfield is correctly handled to include it in the serialized data if it is set.
496-527: Unmarshalling logic for theFallbackfield is correctly implemented, ensuring the field is correctly parsed and set from the input data.
1453-1453: Addition of theFallbackfield to theRegisterAccountDatastructure aligns with the PR's objectives to handle fallback addresses.
1490-1495: Getter for theFallbackfield in theRegisterAccountDatastructure is implemented correctly.api/noble/forwarding/v1/tx.pulsar.go (24)
24-24: Addedfallbackfield descriptor forMsgRegisterAccount.
33-33: Initializedfallbackfield descriptor forMsgRegisterAccount.
119-124: Handling of thefallbackfield in theRangemethod forMsgRegisterAccount.
146-147: AddedHasmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount.
170-171: AddedClearmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount.
197-199: AddedGetmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount.
226-227: AddedSetmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount.
254-255: AddedMutablemethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount. Note that it correctly panics since the field is not mutable.
275-276: AddedNewFieldmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount.
358-361: Added size calculation for thefallbackfield in theProtoMethodssize function forMsgRegisterAccount.
391-397: Added marshaling support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount.
564-595: Added unmarshaling support for thefallbackfield inMsgRegisterAccount.
1052-1055: Added field descriptors forMsgClearAccount, including the newfallbackfield.
1063-1063: Initializedfallbackfield descriptor forMsgClearAccount.
1143-1148: Handling of thefallbackfield in theRangemethod forMsgClearAccount.
1168-1169: AddedHasmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount.
1190-1191: AddedClearmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount.
1214-1216: AddedGetmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount.
1241-1242: AddedSetmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount.
1267-1268: AddedMutablemethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount. Note that it correctly panics since the field is not mutable.
1286-1287: AddedNewFieldmethod support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount.
1365-1367: Added size calculation for thefallbackfield in theProtoMethodssize function forMsgClearAccount.
1397-1406: Added marshaling support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount.
1534-1553: Added unmarshaling support for thefallbackfield inMsgClearAccount.api/noble/forwarding/v1/query.pulsar.go (1)
Line range hint
3766-3808: Addition offallbackfield inQueryAddressmessage.This addition aligns with the PR's objective to implement fallback addresses across various components. The field is correctly defined as a string and is optional, which is standard for protobuf fields that may not always have a value.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .changelog/unreleased/features/12-fallback-address.md (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.changelog/unreleased/features/12-fallback-address.md (1)
1-1: Changelog entry is clear and effectively communicates the new feature.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- .github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- e2e/forwarding_test.go (9 hunks)
- x/forwarding/keeper/keeper.go (6 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/forwarding/keeper/keeper.go
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/e2e-tests.yaml (1)
90-90: Reduced test timeout and enabled race detector.Makefile (1)
70-70: Set timeout for end-to-end tests.e2e/forwarding_test.go (2)
8-8: Importedtimepackage.
Line range hint
25-302: Added and utilizedFallbackfield in test functions.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Fallbackfield for improved account operations and data forwarding capabilities.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Documentation