Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v6.x: backport test: fix test-buffer-slow #10459

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 26, 2016

Conversation

targos
Copy link
Member

@targos targos commented Dec 26, 2016

Backport of #9809

@targos targos added buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests. v6.x labels Dec 26, 2016
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. v6.x labels Dec 26, 2016
Copy link
Member

@addaleax addaleax left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM if CI is green

@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Dec 26, 2016

Fix incorrect use of string instead of RegExp in `throws` assertions.

PR-URL: nodejs#9809
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Michael Dawson <[email protected]>
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Dec 26, 2016

CI failed because I cherry-picked #10146 instead of #10149 before making the PR.
New CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/5589/

@targos targos merged commit 70d3b80 into nodejs:v6.x-staging Dec 26, 2016
@targos targos deleted the backport-9809-v6.x branch December 26, 2016 14:38
@targos
Copy link
Member Author

targos commented Dec 26, 2016

landed in 70d3b80

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants