Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix name constraints check #7

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

bnoordhuis
Copy link
Contributor

There were two bugs. webpki didn't:

  1. read the X.509 Name Constraints field in its entirety, nor

  2. check the certificate subject against the constraints correctly

(1) is a simple fix, (2) requires reading the Common Name from the certificate.

Requires lifting some DER parsing logic from ring to parse UTF8String and Set fields. Ring doesn't support those and isn't likely to in the near future, see briansmith/ring#1265.

Closes #3.

src/der.rs Outdated
Comment on lines 21 to 41
#[allow(clippy::upper_case_acronyms)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Eq, PartialEq)]
#[repr(u8)]
pub enum Tag {
Boolean = 0x01,
Integer = 0x02,
BitString = 0x03,
OctetString = 0x04,
Null = 0x05,
OID = 0x06,
UTF8String = 0x0C,
Sequence = CONSTRUCTED | 0x10, // 0x30
Set = CONSTRUCTED | 0x11, // 0x31
UTCTime = 0x17,
GeneralizedTime = 0x18,

#[allow(clippy::identity_op)]
ContextSpecificConstructed0 = CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | CONSTRUCTED | 0,
ContextSpecificConstructed1 = CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | CONSTRUCTED | 1,
ContextSpecificConstructed3 = CONTEXT_SPECIFIC | CONSTRUCTED | 3,
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit, take it or leave it: it might be worth including a comment stating that this is based on code from ring, so that readers can refer to the upstream code for context? also, ring is relatively permissively licensed, but it does look like the license requires reproducing a copyright notice: https:/briansmith/ring/blob/0f3bf0031a8dbba741b26f1f02ebde6b7db4a3d6/LICENSE#L11-L23

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll add a comment. W.r.t. the license, der.rs from ring is under the same license as webpki, ISC with copyright attributed to Brian. I don't think additional attribution is necessary but I don't mind being proven wrong.

src/der.rs Outdated
#[allow(clippy::upper_case_acronyms)]
#[derive(Clone, Copy, Eq, PartialEq)]
#[repr(u8)]
pub enum Tag {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: should this maybe be

Suggested change
pub enum Tag {
pub(crate) enum Tag {

since it's not publicly re-exported from the der module, and the der module is private?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I followed the existing style of using pub and controlling exports in src/lib.rs. No strong preference though. If more reviewers think it's a good idea, I'll make the change.

src/der.rs Outdated

// TODO: investigate taking decoder as a reference to reduce generated code
// size.
pub fn nested<'a, F, R, E: Copy>(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: should this be

Suggested change
pub fn nested<'a, F, R, E: Copy>(
pub(crate) fn nested<'a, F, R, E: Copy>(

since it's never publicly re-exported?

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #7 (9f3274c) into main (dcfe0b4) will increase coverage by 8.69%.
The diff coverage is 96.42%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main       #7      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   74.60%   83.30%   +8.69%     
==========================================
  Files          19       19              
  Lines        1788     1839      +51     
==========================================
+ Hits         1334     1532     +198     
+ Misses        454      307     -147     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/name/verify.rs 65.55% <93.33%> (+61.41%) ⬆️
src/der.rs 91.11% <95.83%> (+0.93%) ⬆️
tests/integration.rs 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/cert.rs 96.21% <0.00%> (+0.75%) ⬆️
src/name/dns_name.rs 86.76% <0.00%> (+17.27%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@djc
Copy link
Member

djc commented Nov 2, 2022

It would be great if someone can do some thinking on what Brian meant in briansmith/ring#1265 (comment):

I know how to fix the webpki bug and this isn't required for that, so I'm going to close this. I will post a PR for the webpki bug RSN.

As for the visibility comments, I would like to warn(unreachable_pub) sometime soon, so it would be great to align visibility with that.

There were two bugs. webpki didn't:

1. read the X.509 Name Constraints field in its entirety, nor

2. check the certificate subject against the constraints correctly

(1) is a simple fix, (2) requires reading the Common Name from the
certificate.

Requires lifting some DER parsing logic from ring to parse UTF8String
and Set fields. Ring doesn't support those and isn't likely to in the
near future, see briansmith/ring#1265.

Closes briansmith#3.
@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updated, PTAL. Used pub(crate) where possible.

@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ pub fn build_chain(

loop_while_non_fatal_error(intermediate_certs, |cert_der| {
let potential_issuer =
cert::parse_cert(untrusted::Input::from(*cert_der), EndEntityOrCa::Ca(cert))?;
cert::parse_cert(untrusted::Input::from(cert_der), EndEntityOrCa::Ca(cert))?;
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

FYI: triggered clippy::explicit-auto-deref

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can I get a review, please? Thanks.

@@ -160,6 +157,10 @@ fn check_presented_id_conforms_to_constraints_in_subtree(
dns_name::presented_id_matches_constraint(name, base).ok_or(Error::BadDER)
}

(GeneralName::DirectoryName(name), GeneralName::DnsName(base)) => {
common_name(name).map(|cn| cn == base)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

isn't base here a constraint rather than a name? ie it should match if it is equal (as currently) but also match (say) if the name is "www.foo.com" and the constraint allows ".foo.com"?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think my conclusion on this is: it's an excellent start, and fixes web-platform-tests's use of name constraints to reduce the strength of their testing CA. but for me it's underlining a big testing debt here. i will look at that in the coming days; especially and also in the effort to land briansmith/webpki#131

der::nested(inner, der::Tag::Set, Error::BadDER, |tagged| {
der::nested(tagged, der::Tag::Sequence, Error::BadDER, |tagged| {
let value = der::expect_tag_and_get_value(tagged, der::Tag::OID)?;
if value != COMMON_NAME {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This goes wrong if the first AttributeTypeAndValue in the Name has a different OID, and also if there is no commonName in the Subject. I have some test cases coming for this.

@bnoordhuis
Copy link
Contributor Author

bnoordhuis commented Dec 16, 2022

Cards on the table: I've kind of moved on and don't expect to revisit this PR anytime soon. No hard feelings if you want to close it. Feel free to adopt it, of course (edit: which I think you've done.)

@ctz
Copy link
Member

ctz commented Jan 10, 2023

Thanks, this was used as a basis for the fix now on main.

@ctz ctz closed this Jan 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

webpki does not validate certificates with name constraints
5 participants