You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While working on a workaround for #6572 , I realized that the way we guess the number of bits for BLAKE2b (when it differs from standard 512) is wrong.
Indeed, for this, it seems to look at the size given in the algorithm name, while we are looking guessing it from the size of the digest.
While working on a workaround for #6572 , I realized that the way we guess the number of bits for BLAKE2b (when it differs from standard 512) is wrong.
Indeed, for this, it seems to look at the size given in the algorithm name, while we are looking guessing it from the size of the digest.
See the following example :
For now,
cksum
still worksWe remove '-48' from the algo name
Now both implementation fail but for different reasons
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: