Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Neo Core Storage] Implicit methods and tests #3403

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

Jim8y
Copy link
Contributor

@Jim8y Jim8y commented Jul 6, 2024

Description

This pr adds implicit methods for StorageItem and StorageKey, and also added Unit Test to test them.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Optimization (the change is only an optimization)
  • Style (the change is only a code style for better maintenance or standard purpose)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

  • TestStorageKey
  • TestStorageItem

Test Configuration:

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@@ -193,5 +193,15 @@ public void Set(IInteroperable interoperable)
item.cache ??= new BigInteger(item.value.Span);
return (BigInteger)item.cache;
}

public static implicit operator StorageItem(BigInteger value)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just wondering, do you have a use-case for these conversion operators in the code? Usually when we introduce such helpers, there's a need to use them in the code and we replace some real code with these helpers.

Copy link
Member

@cschuchardt88 cschuchardt88 Jul 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Doesn't matter how it done. As long as the do the same thing. We have direct access to the class. So, no need for extension methods. Plus this doesn't convert to BigInteger its allows us to compare the two.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Jim8y Jim8y Jul 11, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm just wondering, do you have a use-case for these conversion operators in the code? Usually when we introduce such helpers, there's a need to use them in the code and we replace some real code with these helpers.

Does it matter ?

@NGDAdmin NGDAdmin merged commit 6c29bde into neo-project:master Jul 16, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
Jim8y added a commit to Jim8y/neo that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2024
* master: (27 commits)
  Revert "Plugin unhandled exception (neo-project#3349)" (neo-project#3366)
  `[Move]` Part-2 Classes into Different Library - `Neo.IO` (neo-project#3388)
  [Neo Core Store] Rename various snapshots. (neo-project#3406)
  [Neo Core Storage] Implicit methods and tests (neo-project#3403)
  [Neo Core MemoryStore] MemoryStore Unit Tests. (neo-project#3404)
  Fixed Publish Step (neo-project#3411)
  Fix release compilation (neo-project#3417)
  [Neo Plugin UT] Rpcserver unit test on node (neo-project#3353)
  Improve code coverage (neo-project#3354)
  `[Add]` Debug Output to `Expect` (neo-project#3407)
  [Neo Plugin Store] Unit test (neo-project#3399)
  Bump System.Text.Json from 8.0.3 to 8.0.4 in /src/Neo.Json (neo-project#3416)
  `[Typo]` Unit Tests - UT_ProtocolSettings.CreateHKSettings (neo-project#3383)
  `[Fix]` Test Problems (neo-project#3398)
  Part-1 `Neo.IO` - move (neo-project#3387)
  Fixed Props Pathing for `dotnet pack` with `nuget` (neo-project#3379)
  `[neo-cli]` Error Message and Warning - LevelDb (neo-project#3380)
  Fix crash when comparing ContractPermissionDescriptor (neo-project#3396)
  `DeprecatedIn` for events (neo-project#3362)
  Fix download tips (neo-project#3395)
  ...
@Jim8y Jim8y deleted the storage-implicit branch July 19, 2024 01:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants